counter
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Ari Berman. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Ari Berman. Sort by date Show all posts

Friday, 9 November 2007

What Is Better? Own Work Crews or Sub-contractors?

The big question: Image Canstockphoto.comThe big question: own work crews or subcontractors?
Image No: 0696754 from Canstockphoto.com
All rights reserved

When doing a renovation or a construction project, what is the difference between using a general contractor with their own crew and one that uses sub-trades? There are a few differences and when making a choice between general contractors, you should be aware of these and of the benefits of choosing one over the other.

First... let's clarify what we are actually discussing. Your general contractor is engaged by you to do the work on your project. The question is does the general contractor use staff that work for him directly or does he subcontract to other tradespersons to do the work and how does that effect your project? Given the quality of apprenticeship programs in Ontario, there should be no difference in workmanship between the staff versus sub-trades. However, frequently customers notice that companies operating with their own crews tend to be unexpectedly slow to complete jobs. One reason suggested for this is that the more jobs that are started, the more efficient the general contractor's labour cost. So, by starting lots of projects, the general contractor is assured of having his crew fully occupied and, that is important to them because the staff crews get paid if there are jobs on the go or not. So, it is not uncommon for a crew to be pulled from one job to be put on a new job many times through the construction season.In contrast, general contractors who operate with sub-trades have options when they wish to start projects. Once the project is secured, they find the sub-contractors to start the project and should they find more work, they find additional resources for those projects. On the matter of time conflicts and delays from lack of contractor availability (and that is possible because a sub-trade may also try to secure multiple concurrent projects), if the project is not moving ahead as required by its contract schedule, another sub-trade can be assigned the work. General contractors with their own crews don't do this because it becomes an additional expense to their operation.

On the matter of cost, there are some direct impacts of using a company which employs its own staff versus using sub-trades. Employee trades need to have contributions by the employer for taxes that apply to all employers. They contribute to the employee's Canada Pension Plan, Unemployment Insurance and Workmans' Compensation. Sub-trades are self employed contractors to the general contractor. They are responsible for their own Workman's Compensation contribution, CPP and don't pay UI. This means that the price paid for a given trade will cost more for employee staff than for sub-trades and this is reflected in the prices quoted for your project. And, in almost every instance, the cost of labour is the largest component in a renovation or construction project.This description of the differences do favour sub-trades over staff crews, but, there are some advantages to hiring a company with its own staff crew. for the most part, there is a feeling that the general contractor has more control over the project. And, this is for the most part a reasonable expectation. However, if the general contractor is re-assigning his resources, the owner of the project is no better off for having made the decision to put their faith in a self-crewed project. But, is there a certain cohesiveness in a crew that is working all 'under one roof' so to speak? All projects are scheduled, so there is typically little un-needed overlapping of the trades. As an example, framers, dry-wallers and painters are almost never sent to the same site at the same time because their work is scheduled to be a sequential group of tasks. So, working as team though a good concept is not required. In fact, they could be non-related workman and if they are scheduled and co-ordinated well by the general contractor, they really need not be involved with each other.

In recommending to someone which choice is better for them it generally becomes a question of cost and risk management. Most often, the general contractor who uses sub-trades will be able to bid costs below the company who keeps resources on the ready and on staff. And, if there is a lot of work taking place in the local construction market, it is more likely that a general contractor using sub-trades will able to keep the project moving forward because they are not tied to one set of staff members. Given the ability to choose, it makes more sense to have a general contractor on your project who has the flexibility to get the resources needed versus the resources he has.
------------------------------
This article was contributed by Ari Berman, a Management Consultant from Toronto, Canada, with a specialization in operations and process change. He has helped companies spanning aircraft builders to soda drink manufacturers to increase their value - finding and improving important details that never got attended to in past. His work in the construction industry includes overseeing commercial construction projects in retail shopping malls across Canada. He can be reached at 647-235-8181 or via e-mail on ari.berman@cmc-advisor.com.

technorati tags:
44 posts tagged
239 posts tagged
109 posts tagged
1 post tagged
No posts tagged
22 posts tagged
3,056 posts tagged
Ari Berman

Posts that contain construction project per day for the last 30 days.
Technorati Chart
Get your own chart!

Tuesday, 10 April 2007

Wo-Built's Design & Build Philosophy

Notes from the Desk of Martina Ernst:
1) Thank Ari Berman for his contribution to the Information Forum
2) Write about Wo-Built's Design & Build Philosophy
Ari Berman’s editorial comments on traditional construction projects versus Design & Build projects reflect some of the reasons why we wanted to be a Design & Build contractor. My heartfelt thanks for your contribution Ari.

Our values are very much anchored in professionalism and customer service and we felt we could best serve our customers by providing a total Design & Build experience. Both Elida Huignard and I have architectural backgrounds and we know the importance of upfront planning and communication between designer and contractor. Combining the two functions under one roof enables faster and better communications, hence making design changes less likely during the construction phase.

The upfront involvement also allows for better planning of necessary resources, both labour and material. Better planning usually results in more efficient use of these resources, reducing delays and last minute high cost purchases. Quality generally is higher with upfront planning and expectations are managed on all sides. Often the most important aspect of a good renovation or construction project is knowing what comes next and what to expect next.

Both Elida and I have worked on large projects in the past and we know the importance of budget restraints, cost planning, adherence to deadlines and the importance of great quality work. The design and build process gives us the confidence to be able to deliver a great quality product and leave a client happy.

Martina Ernst
CEO
Wo-Built Inc

technorati tags:

8 blog posts tagged
18 blog posts tagged
No blog posts tagged
2 blog posts tagged
No blog posts tagged
No blog posts tagged
No blog posts tagged
No blog posts tagged

Posts that contain "design and build" per day for the last 30 days.
Technorati Chart
Get your own chart!

Friday, 6 April 2007

Design & Build Part 4: Some More Thoughts on Design and Build

Image: MS Office
Keywords: architects, blueprints, construction, contractors, developers
Ok, so the million Dollar question is - 'If the Design & Build process is so good why doesn't everyone use it?'

Well, one disadvantage is that the contractual set-up tends to be much more involved than for the traditional one. It requires a lot more up-front work by the contractor which is largely unpaid and much more risky than traditional project bidding. From a home owners perspective the Design and Build process has been largely associated with large public projects and the benefits for smaller projects have not been publicized well. Also there is the fear that one would not get the best deal, by locking in too early and to one provider.

But in our competitive world, there is an emphasis on customer satisfaction to provide repeat and referral business. A properly documented and executed Design & Build process is the more customer friendly and satisfying because it almost totally eliminates the wiggle room for stretching out your project's time or cost. It also gives the client a lot more influence and power in the relationship. By dealing with just one representative responsible for all areas of the project, confusion about who was supposed to do what, when that was to happen and who had to make the call is made very simple and direct. If Design & Build is good enough for mega projects, its benefits will compel smaller consumers to demand the same protection and services. My prediction is that over the next few years Design & Build will be on the rise as consumers insist on having more control and less risk on their projects.
_______________________________________________________________
This article was contributed by Ari Berman, a Management Consultant from Toronto, Canada, with a specialization in operations and process change. He has helped companies spanning aircraft builders to soda drink manufacturers to increase their value - finding and improving important details that never got attended to in past. His work in the construction industry includes overseeing commercial construction projects in retail shopping malls across Canada. He can be reached at 647-235-8181 or via e-mail on ari.berman@cmc-advisor.com.

technorati tags:

24,845 blog posts tagged
4 blog posts tagged
12 blog posts tagged
No blog posts tagged
62 blog posts tagged
1,416 blog posts tagged
18 blog posts tagged

29 blog posts tagged
No blog posts tagged


Posts that contain "design and build" per day for the last 30 days.
Technorati Chart
Get your own chart!

Tuesday, 20 March 2007

Design & Build Part 1: Is the Design and Build Process Better Than the Traditional Construction One?

Image: MS Office
Keywords: architects, blueprints, construction, contractors, developers
Many of us have first hand stories about the problems faced by people in a traditional construction project - planned separately from the construction. First, we plan our dream house or space with our chosen designer or architect, who gives us a cost estimate to the best of his/her knowledge. Then we go through the dreaded tender process and are confronted with the question 'Do we accept the low bid... it's even lower than the estimate?'. We know the contractor is going to charge additional fees for any changes from the plan needed to do the job and that could be a lot. Alternatively, what if all the bids come in too high? We wonder why and find that the designer's language and the contractors understanding of what's needed are not perfectly matched or the specifications of the plan miss details that the contractors believe they need to do the project. Either way, the result is higher cost resulting from project overruns or more design fees and re-tendering. Cost over-runs in construction projects are by far the norm and not the exception.

So, let’s say we do go ahead and choose the contractor, but then they cannot start for a few months because of labour shortages. This adds a lot of time to the project and our schedule goes right out the window. This is the sort of stress that many people don't expect or appreciate and it turns their lives upside down. Then, finally the contractor does start, but the work seems to drag on forever. Dust is everywhere, the kitchen and bathrooms are out of commission intermittently or in succession and compounding the inconvenience and mess, the timelines seem to continually slip. I know this is a broad brush generalisation, but if you talk to your friends, they will gladly share their horror stories with you.

So, is Design & Build the solution?

Click here to read the next instalment.
_______________________________________________________________
This article was contributed by Ari Berman, a Management Consultant from Toronto, Canada, with a specialization in operations and process change. He has helped companies spanning aircraft builders to soda drink manufacturers to increase their value - finding and improving important details that never got attended to in past. His work in the construction industry includes overseeing commercial construction projects in retail shopping malls across Canada. He can be reached at 647-235-8181 or via e-mail on ari.berman@cmc-advisor.com.

technorati tags:

199 blog posts tagged
22,362 blog posts tagged
1,581 blog posts tagged
18,440 blog posts tagged
2,482 blog posts tagged
282,515 blog posts tagged
8,516 blog posts tagged
23 blog posts tagged
18 blog posts tagged
27 blog posts tagged
No blog posts tagged

Posts that contain "design and build" per day for the last 30 days.
Technorati Chart
Get your own chart!

Tuesday, 3 April 2007

Design & Build Part 3: How Will We Know If a Design and Build Contractor Is Pricing Accurately?

Image: MS Office
Keywords: architects, blueprints, construction, contractors, developers
A Design & Build contractor can save money on a project by doing good cost planning, managing site logistics and reducing or eliminating rework/redesign costs. But why would they not take advantage of their position to squeeze the client and fatten their margins? They are, after all, engaged before the design is finalized and have ample opportunity to pump up the numbers. The controls again are built into how they secure their engagement - by the budget and cost estimate they develop during the initial discussions and consultation. Unless the scope changes drastically they are contracted to stay within those limits. The firm contract price which is developed during the detailed design is based on a published fee structures and cost guidelines. Since they are involved in all the stages of the process, they also take some of the risks by giving a firm price at the beginning. They are stake-holders in their clients' projects. And if we as the clients still have doubt about cost validity, additional checks and balances can be introduced, such as an independent cost consultant, detailed fee breakdowns with negotiated percentages and fully disclosed and detailed change order pricing.

From the standpoint of cost and time controls, the Design & Build process outperforms over the traditional construction one.

Some more thoughts on Design & Build. Click here to read on.
_______________________________________________________________
This article was contributed by Ari Berman, a Management Consultant from Toronto, Canada, with a specialization in operations and process change. He has helped companies spanning aircraft builders to soda drink manufacturers to increase their value - finding and improving important details that never got attended to in past. His work in the construction industry includes overseeing commercial construction projects in retail shopping malls across Canada. He can be reached at 647-235-8181 or via e-mail on ari.berman@cmc-advisor.com.

technorati tags:

4 blog posts tagged
11 blog posts tagged
37 blog posts tagged
64 blog posts tagged
1 blog post tagged
7 blog posts tagged
18 blog posts tagged

31 blog posts tagged
No blog posts tagged


Posts that contain "design and build" per day for the last 30 days.
Technorati Chart
Get your own chart!